M MurmTools

HubSpot across 190 measured sites

HubSpot is a CRM and marketing platform. Companies install its script to run forms, live chat, email capture and visitor analytics, which is why the name turns up on business websites rather than on publishers. This index recorded it on 190 sites out of 5,294 measured, rank 20 of the 88 companies tracked. The distinctive thing about it is not how heavy those pages are. It is that installing HubSpot does not add one hostname to a page — it adds a household of them.

Six of its ten closest neighbours are its own

Of the ten hostnames most often present on the same page as HubSpot, six belong to HubSpot itself. hs-banner.com was on 139 of the 190 sites, 73.2 percent. hs-analytics.net on 134, 70.5 percent. hsforms.com on 124, 65.3 percent. hsadspixel.net on 88, 46.3 percent. hubapi.com on 65, 34.2 percent. hscollectedforms.net on 58, 30.5 percent.

That is what a platform looks like when it is counted honestly from the network side. One line of installed script fans out into six or more separate origins, each of which a browser must resolve, connect to and trust. Nothing here suggests any of them is doing something the customer did not ask for; it does mean that any count of "third parties on this page" that treats each hostname as a company will read HubSpot as a crowd.

A hostname the banner detector does not recognise

hs-banner.com is the most frequent of those six, on 139 sites. It does not appear in the list of consent tools the crawl detects on these sites — that list is OneTrust on 37, Osano on 15, Cookiebot on 11, CookieYes on 10, an IAB TCF consent tool on 6 and Usercentrics on 5. Sites can carry more than one banner and each recognised tool is counted separately, so those figures are not slices of a whole.

The consequence is worth stating plainly, because it affects how the next number should be read: 88 of the 190 sites are recorded as carrying a detectable consent tool. A HubSpot site whose only consent interface comes from HubSpot's own stack would fall into the other 102. The crawl detects six banner products; it does not claim to detect every banner that exists.

The pages themselves are mid-sized

The median HubSpot site contacted 12 separate companies across 43 requests, 3 of them classified as tracking. Among the 88 companies in this index that is rank 30 on companies, rank 47 on requests and rank 26 on trackers — the middle of the field. This is not an advertising page; it is a company website with a marketing stack on it.

Google was present on 170 of the 190 sites, 89.5 percent, and LinkedIn on 57, 30 percent. jsDelivr on 35 and Amazon CloudFront on 33 round out the list — content delivery rather than measurement. The LinkedIn share is the tell that these are business-to-business sites.

Early contact, and the sites where nothing came early

182 of the 190 sites had at least one company contacted before a consent choice could have been recorded — 95.8 percent, rank 23 of 88. The median count of companies arriving in that window is 9; the median arriving after it closes is 1.

HubSpot was present on those 182 sites; the crawl records the count per site and not which companies made up that count, so nothing here identifies HubSpot as one of the nine. What the examples do show is a genuine spread. doubleverify.com contacted 9 companies with all 9 early, first contact 276 ms. 3lift.com: 9 and 9, at 317 ms, behind a Usercentrics banner. applovin.com: 18 companies, 16 early, at 661 ms.

And then the sites that waited. vungle.com contacted 14 companies with none of them inside the window, first contact 2116 ms. mediatek.com: 14 companies, none early, 2045 ms. Those are the shape of the 8 sites with no early contact at all.

Timing

Median first contact on a HubSpot site was 586 ms, which ranks 68th of the 88 companies here, where rank 1 is the longest wait. The earliest single first contact recorded was 92 ms.

The individual numbers stretch further than the median suggests: ipinfo.io at 201 ms with 3 companies all early, one.one at 1298 ms with 2 of 5 early behind a Cookiebot banner, stackadapt.com at 1351 ms with 5 of 9 early. On a business site the first contact is usually the marketing stack booting, and how early it boots is a configuration decision rather than a property of any one vendor.

Highest-ranked sites where this was seen
SiteCompaniesBefore consentFirst contact
one.one521298 ms
applovin.com1816661 ms
vungle.com1402116 ms
forter.com44443 ms
inmobi.com169947 ms
doubleverify.com99276 ms
mediatek.com1402045 ms
3lift.com99317 ms
ipinfo.io33201 ms
klaviyo.com1410587 ms
stackadapt.com951351 ms
ipify.org1311673 ms
Consent tools seen on these sites
ToolSites
OneTrust37
Osano15
Cookiebot11
CookieYes10
IAB TCF consent tool6
Usercentrics5

The six most common are listed. The remaining 4 of 88 sites with a banner carry something outside that six. One tool is recorded per site, so these counts never overlap.

Seen on the same pages

Companies most often contacted by the same sites. Co-presence only — the crawl records what arrived, not who called whom.

Questions

What is HubSpot doing on a company's website?

Running the marketing side of its CRM: forms, chat, email capture, visitor analytics, sometimes ad conversion tracking. This index found it on 190 of the 5,294 sites measured.

Why do so many hs- hostnames appear at once?

Because the platform is served from several origins. Six of them appear in the ten names most often present alongside HubSpot, led by hs-banner.com on 73.2 percent of its sites and hs-analytics.net on 70.5 percent.

Do HubSpot sites show cookie banners?

88 of the 190 carry one of the six consent tools this crawl detects. hs-banner.com, present on 139 sites, is not among those six, so the count is a floor rather than a census.

How busy is a typical HubSpot page?

12 companies over 43 requests at the median, 3 of them classified as tracking — rank 30, 47 and 26 respectively among the 88 companies in this index.

Did anything on these sites load before consent?

On 182 of the 190, at least one company was contacted before a choice could have been recorded, with a median of 9 companies in that window. The crawl does not record which companies those were.

Check any page yourself MurmStack is the tool that produced these figures. Free, two permissions, no host access.
Add to Chrome — free