M MurmTools

Google Fonts / APIs

Google Fonts / APIs is the label for Google's hosted font and library service: the request a page makes to fetch a typeface, or a shared JavaScript library, from Google's servers rather than from its own. It is what puts a Google address in the network log of a site that otherwise has nothing to do with Google. This index does not classify it as a tracking service; it is filed under fonts and APIs. It was detected on 288 of the 5,294 sites measured, 5.4 percent, making it the tenth most-encountered of the 88 companies here.

Wide reach, thin pages

The interesting part is what those 288 sites look like once you are on them. On median companies contacted, this set ranks 88th of the 88 companies in the index. On median third-party requests, 88th of 88. On median trackers, 88th of 88. The figures behind the three ranks are 3 companies, 8 requests and 0 trackers. Eight third-party requests is not far above what a page with a single outside dependency would make. Reach and weight point in opposite directions here about as sharply as they can: tenth of 88 for how many sites carry it, last of 88 for what those sites do.

Nothing dominant travels with it

The strongest co-presence across the 288 is Cloudflare, on 44 of them, 15.3 percent. Behind it: Yandex Metrica and yandex.com on 30 each, 10.4 percent; OneTrust on 26, 9 percent; jsDelivr on 23, 8 percent; adobedtm.com on 20, 6.9 percent; trustarc.com and demdex.net on 12 each, 4.2 percent; Cloudflare Analytics and BootstrapCDN on 11 each, 3.8 percent. Nothing reaches a fifth of the set. Sites that fetch a typeface from Google share almost nothing else with one another, which is the signature of a dependency that is close to universal rather than characteristic of one kind of publisher.

Most of these sites have no banner at all

45 of the 288 sites carried a recognisable consent tool, roughly one in six. OneTrust was seen on 25, the IAB TCF signal on 8, Osano on 7, CookieYes on 2, and Usercentrics and Cookiebot on 1 each, counted as sightings rather than shares because a site can carry more than one. Meanwhile 274 of the 288, or 95.1 percent, were sites where at least one company was contacted before a banner window could have closed, a figure that ranks 31st of 88. On most pages in this set there was no banner to answer in the first place.

The range across the 288

googledomains.com registered a single company; cloudflare-dns.com registered 2; vimeo.com, cloudflare.net, ieee.org and yieldmo.com registered 4 apiece; tinyurl.com and newrelic.com 5. At the far end foxnews.com registered 17 with 15 of them inside the window, and forbes.com 10, all inside. flickr.com registered 8 running Osano. wiley.com, also running Osano, was the latest of these examples to begin at 1,092 milliseconds, while newrelic.com began earliest at 238. Median first contact across the whole group was 548 milliseconds, 74th of 88, and the earliest recorded anywhere was 64 milliseconds. At the median no company is contacted after the window closes.

Why a typeface counts as a third party

When a page asks your browser to fetch a font from Google's servers, your browser opens a connection to a domain other than the one you typed, and that request carries your IP address and the address of the page asking for it, exactly as any other cross-domain request does. That is why it is counted here alongside analytics calls and advertising beacons. Counting it is not a claim about what is done with it, and this index draws the distinction explicitly: fonts and APIs are recorded as contact and are not in the tracking classification. A site that copies the font files onto its own server makes no such request and would not appear in this set at all. The full method is at /consent-gap, and MurmStack performs the same measurement on a page while you are reading it.

Highest-ranked sites where this was seen
SiteCompaniesBefore consentFirst contact
googledomains.com11360 ms
cloudflare.net42343 ms
vimeo.com44320 ms
cloudflare-dns.com22334 ms
flickr.com88457 ms
forbes.com1010387 ms
tinyurl.com55290 ms
wiley.com551092 ms
foxnews.com1715358 ms
ieee.org44286 ms
newrelic.com55238 ms
yieldmo.com44691 ms
Consent tools seen on these sites
ToolSites
OneTrust25
IAB TCF consent tool8
Osano7
CookieYes2
Usercentrics1
Cookiebot1

The six most common are listed. The remaining 1 of 45 sites with a banner carry something outside that six. One tool is recorded per site, so these counts never overlap.

Seen on the same pages

Companies most often contacted by the same sites. Co-presence only โ€” the crawl records what arrived, not who called whom.

Questions

Does loading a Google font send data to Google?

The request goes to servers Google operates and, like any web request, carries your IP address and a referring page address. What happens to it after that is outside what a page-load crawl can observe. What this index records is that the request was made, on 288 of the 5,294 sites measured.

Why are the medians for these sites so low?

Because the service turns up on every kind of site, including very simple ones. The set ranks 88th of 88 on median companies contacted, median requests and median trackers, with values of 3, 8 and 0. That is a statement about the breadth of the sample, not about the service.

Can a site avoid the third-party request?

Yes. Font files and JavaScript libraries can be served from the site's own domain, in which case no cross-domain connection is opened and the site would not appear in this set. It is a hosting decision rather than a design one.

What does tenth of 88 mean here?

It is a ranking by reach: of the 88 companies this index tracks, only nine were detected on more sites. Reach says nothing about the weight of those sites, which is why the same entry sits at 88th of 88 on all three weight measures.

Check any page yourself MurmStack is the tool that produced these figures. Free, two permissions, no host access.
Add to Chrome — free