adnxs.com in the Consent Gap Index
adnxs.com is the request hostname of the AppNexus ad exchange, the real-time bidding infrastructure now operated under the Xandr name. When a page sells its ad space by auction, this is one of the hosts the auction runs through. You would meet it in a network log or a blocker's report on a news or classifieds site. It has no entry in the vendor catalogue this index uses, so no category is attached to it here. It was recorded on 138 sites, 2.6 percent of the 5,294 measured — and the pages it appears on carry the highest median company count in the index.
Twenty-three companies is the highest median here
The median site carrying adnxs.com contacts 23 distinct companies. That is the highest median company count of the 88 companies in this index. Alongside it: 6 companies classified as trackers on the median site — no company of the 88 has a higher median, and Criteo and creativecdn.com report the same 6 — and 99 requests to third-party hosts, which is 2nd of 88. To put the shape of that in plain terms, a visitor loading one of these pages sets off contact with roughly two dozen separate organisations and around a hundred network calls before they have read a paragraph. This is what a page financed by programmatic auction looks like when it is measured rather than described.
Eight more companies after the consent window
The median adnxs.com site had 11 companies contacted before a banner answer could be registered — 8th of the 88 companies indexed, with seven above it and eight others reporting the same 11. What is unusual about these pages is what happens next: on the median site, 8 further companies are contacted after the consent window closes. Auction-driven pages do not assemble their guest list in advance. Each bid response can introduce a party the page had never contacted before, which is why the count keeps climbing after the opening burst rather than settling. It also means a snapshot taken at first render substantially understates who ends up involved.
Banners on 83 of 138 sites
83 of the 138 sites carried a consent tool. Six were seen alongside them: an IAB TCF consent tool on 57 sites, OneTrust on 17, Osano on 5, Cookiebot on 2, Usercentrics on 1 and CookieYes on 1. The dominance of the IAB TCF tool is the notable part. That framework exists specifically to pass consent signals into an advertising auction, so its concentration here is a direct reflection of what these pages are: inventory, sold in real time, to buyers who need a consent string to bid.
Early contact is comparatively rare
Early contact happened on 121 of the 138 sites, 87.7 percent — which ranks 77th of the 88 companies here, one of the lower shares in the index. The median site made its first third-party request at 703 milliseconds, ranking 36th of 88, with the fastest recorded at 75 milliseconds. That combination is worth sitting with. This is simultaneously the group with the largest median cast and one of the groups least likely to have contacted anyone in the opening window. Heaviness and earliness are different properties, and the auction stack is heavy late rather than fast early.
The named sites, and how far apart they sit
globo.com contacted 36 companies with 3 of them early and first contact at 1,733 ms. cbc.ca shows 32 companies with 11 early at 629 ms, and tenki.jp 25 with 5 early at 463 ms. netkeiba.com contacted 21 with only 3 early, at 1,403 ms. Against those, lanacion.com.ar shows 20 companies with all 20 inside the early window at 396 ms, vg.no 12 of 12 at 248 ms and aftonbladet.se 11 of 11 at 386 ms — three sites where the entire cast arrives before an answer is possible. The business-software end of the sample is lighter: qualtrics.com at 8 companies with 6 early, autodesk.com at 10 with 4, trendmicro.com at 18 with 13. uol.com.br shows 16 with 11 early and olx.com.br 13 with 9.
The company it keeps
Google was present on 94 of the 138 sites, 68.1 percent. Criteo follows on 56 sites (40.6 percent), Amazon Ads on 40 (29) and Comscore on 31 (22.5). These are counts of sites where both were seen, not statements about who called whom. Taken together they describe a well-defined market segment rather than a random slice of the web: ad-financed publishers running a demand stack deep enough that a single exchange hostname is a reliable marker for the other two dozen.
| Site | Companies | Before consent | First contact |
|---|---|---|---|
| autodesk.com | 10 | 4 | 901 ms |
| globo.com | 36 | 3 | 1733 ms |
| trendmicro.com | 18 | 13 | 924 ms |
| uol.com.br | 16 | 11 | 1194 ms |
| qualtrics.com | 8 | 6 | 1085 ms |
| olx.com.br | 13 | 9 | 949 ms |
| cbc.ca | 32 | 11 | 629 ms |
| lanacion.com.ar | 20 | 20 | 396 ms |
| aftonbladet.se | 11 | 11 | 386 ms |
| vg.no | 12 | 12 | 248 ms |
| netkeiba.com | 21 | 3 | 1403 ms |
| tenki.jp | 25 | 5 | 463 ms |
| Tool | Sites |
|---|---|
| IAB TCF consent tool | 57 |
| OneTrust | 17 |
| Osano | 5 |
| Cookiebot | 2 |
| Usercentrics | 1 |
| CookieYes | 1 |
Seen on the same pages
Companies most often contacted by the same sites. Co-presence only — the crawl records what arrived, not who called whom.
- GoogleTogether on 94 of these sites
- CriteoTogether on 56 of these sites
- creativecdn.comTogether on 49 of these sites
- Amazon AdsTogether on 40 of these sites
- ComscoreTogether on 31 of these sites
- amazonaws.comTogether on 20 of these sites
- crwdcntrl.netTogether on 19 of these sites
- jsDelivrTogether on 19 of these sites
Questions
What is adnxs.com?
The request hostname used by the AppNexus advertising exchange, now run under the Xandr name. It carries auction traffic for pages that sell ad space programmatically. This index does not assign it a category, because it has no vendor-catalogue entry here.
Why do these pages contact so many companies?
Because a real-time auction introduces parties during the load rather than before it. The median site contacts 23 companies overall, the highest of the 88 indexed, and 8 of them arrive after the consent window has closed.
Do sites with adnxs.com show consent banners?
Most do: 83 of the 138. An IAB TCF consent tool was seen alongside 57 of them, far more than any other, which fits a page whose business model requires a machine-readable consent signal.
How does its early-contact rate compare?
It is lower than most. 121 of 138 sites, 87.7 percent, saw early contact — 77th of the 88 companies in this index. The weight of these pages arrives across the whole load rather than all at the start.