M MurmTools

btloader.com: an uncatalogued host on very busy pages

btloader.com is a hostname you meet in a network log or a blocklist, not a brand you meet on a page. This index has no vendor entry for it: no company name, no category, and no classification as tracking or not tracking either way. What it has is 89 sites out of the 5,294 measured where a browser opened a connection to it, a co-presence pattern tight enough to look deliberate, and a set of pages that rank near the top of this index for weight.

It arrives with the same two hostnames nearly every time

ad-delivery.net was present on 87 of the 89 sites — 97.8% — and dns-finder.com on 79, or 88.8%. Only after those two does the list start to look like advertising in general: Google on 64 sites (71.9%), Amazon Ads on 41 (46.1%), Comscore on 28 (31.5%), crwdcntrl.net and fastclick.net on 21 each (23.6%), jsDelivr on 17 (19.1%), Cloudflare Analytics and confiant-integrations.net on 14 each (15.7%).

Most entities in this index have a co-presence list that opens with Google, because Google is on a great many pages. This one opens with two hostnames almost nobody could name, at rates that suggest they are delivered as a unit rather than chosen separately. The crawl records that they were on the same pages. It does not establish who operates any of them, and this page will not fill that gap with a guess.

Twelve companies before anything could be answered

The median site here contacted 12 companies inside the pre-consent window, which ranks 4th of the 88 companies in this index — three entities sit on pages with a higher median and three more report the same 12. The same median page contacted 18 companies in total, seventh of 88, over 85 requests, eighth of 88.

Early contact was recorded on 81 of the 89 sites, 91%. As everywhere in this corpus, that is counted per site and not by name: the measurement knows how many companies arrived in the window, never which ones, so nothing here places btloader.com among them on any particular page.

94% of these sites did show a banner

Consent software was detected on 84 of the 89 sites. The IAB TCF framework was seen alongside on 62 of them, OneTrust on 17, Cookiebot on 4 and Usercentrics on 1; sites can carry more than one banner, so these are sightings rather than portions of the 84.

That number closes off the usual explanation. Across this index the common reason a page has early contact is that it never asked anything at all. Here almost every site asked. These publishers built a consent interface, most of them using the advertising industry's own framework, and the median page still reached twelve companies before that interface could have been answered.

Three trackers, eighteen companies

Only 3 companies on the median page were classified as tracking, which ranks 23rd of 88 and sits oddly beside the 18 companies contacted.

The explanation is in the catalogue rather than the page. Classification requires a vendor entry, most of the hostnames on these pages do not have one — btloader.com included — and an uncatalogued domain cannot be classified as anything. On pages assembled out of unfamiliar advertising hosts, the tracker count understates by construction. Where the two numbers disagree this far, the count of companies is the one describing the page.

Fast, and on sites you have heard of

Median first contact was 530 ms, ranking 78th of 88 on a scale where rank 1 is the slowest median; the quickest recorded in the group was 85 ms.

time.com contacted 26 companies with 22 of them inside the window, first contact at 157 ms, behind an IAB TCF banner. imgur.com: 14 and 14, at 216 ms. theverge.com: 21 and 21, at 271 ms behind OneTrust. letterboxd.com: 10 and 10. lanacion.com.ar: 20 and 20. ynet.co.il: 27 with 20. msn.com, the highest-ranked site in the sample, contacted 12 with 11 inside the window at 417 ms. Then nexusmods.com at 17 with 12 behind a Cookiebot banner, gsmarena.com at 11 with 9, gamewith.jp at 14 with 13, and otomoto.pl at 12 with 8. olx.pl is the slow one: 14 companies, 6 inside the window, first contact at 1,152 ms.

Highest-ranked sites where this was seen
SiteCompaniesBefore consentFirst contact
msn.com1211417 ms
time.com2622157 ms
imgur.com1414216 ms
theverge.com2121271 ms
nexusmods.com1712472 ms
letterboxd.com1010251 ms
gsmarena.com119703 ms
olx.pl1461152 ms
lanacion.com.ar2020396 ms
ynet.co.il2720506 ms
otomoto.pl128677 ms
gamewith.jp1413731 ms
Consent tools seen on these sites
ToolSites
IAB TCF consent tool62
OneTrust17
Cookiebot4
Usercentrics1

Seen on the same pages

Companies most often contacted by the same sites. Co-presence only — the crawl records what arrived, not who called whom.

Questions

What is btloader.com?

An advertising-related hostname with no entry in this index's vendor catalogue, so it carries no company name, no category and no tracking classification here. The measured facts are its presence on 89 sites, its near-constant pairing with ad-delivery.net, and the weight of the pages it appears on.

Why does it always show up with ad-delivery.net?

The crawl records only that they were on the same pages — 87 of 89. A rate that high normally means two components delivered together rather than bought separately, but this measurement cannot confirm ownership or any commercial relationship.

Should I block it?

That is a decision this data does not make for you. It can tell you the hostname appears on ad-funded publisher pages that contact a median of 18 companies, and that it has no vendor classification here. It cannot tell you what any request carried, because payloads were never inspected.

Do these sites ask for consent?

84 of the 89 showed a banner the crawl could detect, most of them running the IAB TCF framework. Early contact was still recorded on 81 sites.

Check any page yourself MurmStack is the tool that produced these figures. Free, two permissions, no host access.
Add to Chrome — free